Eero Vasa vs Aleksander Orlikowski Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Orlikowski has outperformed Vasa in recent second serve points won, with percentages of 47.95% and 44.77% respectively. How significant is this? Winning more second serve points often correlates with better match predictions.
• In their return game, Orlikowski again has an advantage, securing 49.23% of points on their opponent's second serve compared to Vasa's 46.15%. In first serve returns, Orlikowski's 33.95% is superior to Vasa's 28.2%.
• Analyzing pressure scenarios shows Vasa has been slightly better at saving breakpoints, with 54.68% compared to Orlikowski's 50%. Which player handles pressure better? Vasa has a slight edge here.
• Performance over the last year indicates Orlikowski has a higher win rate at 66.67%, compared to Vasa's 54.55%. Orlikowski seems to be in better form.
• Both players thrive on Clay courts, with Vasa having a marginally better win rate of 57% compared to Orlikowski's 54% on this surface.
• In terms of competition level, Orlikowski's opponents have an average rank of 208.56, which is significantly higher than Vasa's 387.15. Could this imply Orlikowski is more prepared for tougher matches?
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Orlikowski also has a slight advantage by winning 67% of such matches, while Vasa has won 62%.
• Despite having better conversion rates in breakpoints at 31.18% (Vasa) versus Orlikowski's 20.69%, Vasa falls shorter in other critical areas.

Editorial Prediction (July 10, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming tennis match presents an intriguing matchup as both players come with specific strengths and weaknesses. Orlikowski shows a consistent pattern of strong performances in second serve points and return games, critical areas that often determine match outcomes.

Vasa, while proficient in saving breakpoints and converting them, does not quite match Orlikowski's statistics when it comes to overall match win percentages and quality of opposition faced.

Orlikowski’s experience against higher-ranked players and superior performance in deciding set situations further accentuates their edge. Though the competitors are close, these factors tilt the scale.

Based on the analysis, Orlikowski appears the likely winner of this match, with greater overall consistency and adaptability to challenging playing conditions.